A Book to trust #17 Biblical archaeology vs Historical science or study #2 Relevance of Biblical record

The Bible never had the intention to be a day-to day factual record of historical events. Biblical archaeology as a historical discipline can contribute to our understanding of Bible history, though we may find lots of people who do not want to make use of those new scientific and archaeological findings and keep claiming that their English King James Bible is the only true and right bible in the world, as if God would only have privileged the English speaking people to come to know His Word.. When looking at how many times scientists and politicians changed of opinion about certain matters or on their thoughts how everything works and how the world has been or should be constructed, we can see that they would better have listened more to the advice given in the book of books, the Bible.

A Book to trust #10 Archaeology confirming or denying claims of the Bible #1 Old Testament

Since the 19th century the people who very suspicious because they did not see historical evidence could find one city after another, one civilization after another, one culture after another being found and restored to their proper places in ancient history by the studies of archaeologists and Bible scholars like Botta, Layard, Wellhausen, Winckler, Taylor, Archer a.o..